- Jan 14, 2026
- Siddhartha Dave
Featured Articles
When the Communist Party of China Comes Knocking at Nagpur’s Doorstep
A civilisational, ideological and strategic reading The visit of a delegation of the Communist Party of China (CPC) to the headquarters of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in Nagpur, as reported by The Print, deserves to be read with greater strategic clarity and civilisational confidence than most early commentaries have allowed. This was not merely a “courtesy call,” nor an initiative born out of ideological curiosity alone. It was, in many ways, a compelled outreach—a pragmatic necessity for Beijing in a rapidly shifting Asian balance of power. That the CPC sought to understand “how the RSS functions” is itself telling. It reflects not Chinese confidence, but Chinese constraint. Beijing today finds itself with limited diplomatic manoeuvring space vis-à-vis Bharat, and dialogue—especially with forces that shape India beyond the state—is no longer optional. It is the only viable path left to avoid a prolonged strategic cold war in Asia. The Context: Engagement by Compulsion, Not Choice The CPC delegation’s visit to Keshav Kunj came immediately after its meeting with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) headquarters—its first such engagement in six years. As The Print notes, this followed the October 2024 disengagement agreement along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), after relations had remained frozen since the Galwan conflict of 2020. It is important to underline this sequencing. China did not initiate dialogue from a position of strength. It was forced into recalibration after four years of strategic stagnation, economic headwinds, growing global mistrust, and a hardened Indian posture—political, military, and societal. Bharat did not come seeking reassurance; China came seeking stability. Seen in this light, Beijing’s outreach to the RSS is less about goodwill and more about damage limitation. The Chinese leadership understands that in today’s Bharat, policy is not shaped merely by ministries and parties, but by a wider civilisational consensus—one in which the RSS plays a decisive role. Why the RSS Matters to Beijing According to The Print, the delegation met RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale for an hour, in the absence of RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat, who was travelling. Sangh sources described the meeting as a courtesy visit with no formal agenda. Yet, in strategic affairs, who seeks whom is often more important than what is said. The CPC’s interest in the RSS stems from a sober assessment of three realities: First, the RSS represents continuity. Governments change, coalitions shift, but the Sangh has sustained organisational discipline, ideological coherence, and grassroots penetration for nearly a century. For a party-state like the CPC—deeply concerned with regime durability—this longevity outside formal state power is impossible to ignore. Second, the RSS shapes the national mood. Post-Galwan, Indian public opinion hardened decisively against China. This was not a transient media reaction but a societal shift. Beijing understands that repairing ties with Bharat requires engaging not just with diplomats, but with the deeper sources of national resolve. Third, the RSS offers an alternative model of national organisation—one rooted in culture, memory, and voluntary discipline rather than coercive state control. For a Leninist party accustomed to top-down mobilisation, this bottom-up civilisational energy is both unfamiliar and strategically consequential. Strategic Signalling—The Core Meaning of the Meeting It would be mistaken to over-intellectualise this interaction as ideological convergence or mutual admiration. That is not its significance. What this meeting fundamentally represents is strategic signalling From China’s side, it is an acknowledgement—quiet but unmistakable—that India’s national will is no longer shaped by post-colonial diffidence or elite ambivalence. Bharat today speaks with a confident civilisational voice, one that draws legitimacy from history, culture, and societal consensus rather than external validation. Beijing is being compelled to engage with that reality. From the Sangh’s side, the meeting reflects composure and confidence. Dialogue was neither avoided nor sensationalised. There was no dilution of principles, no performative outreach. The message was clear: a meeting does not mean endorsement, and conversation does not mean compromise. The RSS engaged from a position of civilisational self-assurance, not diplomatic anxiety. This asymmetry is crucial. China reached out because it had to. The RSS received because it could afford to. The Larger Message for Bharat’s Intellectual and Strategic Community Perhaps the most important implication of this episode lies closer home. The fact that the CPC seeks to understand the RSS carries a powerful message for Bharat’s own intellectual and strategic class. For decades, sections of India’s elite—especially within academia, media, and policy circles—dismissed the Sangh as parochial, reactionary, or politically incidental. That narrative is no longer sustainable. Today, a global power with one of the world’s most sophisticated intelligence and party apparatuses recognises the RSS as a key node of influence worth studying. Not opposing. Not ignoring. Studying. This moment should prompt serious introspection within Bharat. It underlines that civilisational forces, long marginalised in elite discourse, are now central to India’s global posture. Strategic depth in the 21st century is not produced by GDP figures alone, but by societal cohesion, cultural confidence, and ideological clarity. Civilisational Confidence in an Uncertain World As The Print observes, these engagements are part of a broader attempt to stabilise India–China relations after years of confrontation. But stability today does not arise from accommodation alone; it flows from mutual recognition of resolve. The CPC’s visit to the RSS headquarters marks an unspoken admission: Bharat is no longer a passive civilisational space to be managed through diplomacy alone. It is an assertive civilisational state, anchored in institutions that predate the modern republic and will likely outlast any single political dispensation. For the RSS, this interaction reaffirms a simple truth—it does not need validation, but it commands attention. And in global politics, attention is often the clearest measure of influence.- Jan 12, 2026
- Vladimir Adityanaath
