The Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC) has once again reaffirmed its resolve to continue its struggle for public rights in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). The committee has accused the authorities of suppressing a peaceful movement through the use of force while failing to address the issues repeatedly raised by the people.

In a statement shared on the social media platform X, JAAC released its Charter of Demands and claimed that both the Government of Pakistan and the PoJK administration had previously recognised these demands. The committee alleged that instead of addressing these concerns, political parties were attempting to divert public attention from the core issues raised by the movement.

Highlighting its position, JAAC stated, "This is our Charter of Demands, which has been recognised by the Government of Pakistan and the Government of PoJK. All political parties have devised a plan to crush the people by deviating from these demands, relying on the basis of force."

The committee said that its demands reflect the concerns and aspirations of the people of PoJK. According to JAAC, the movement seeks reforms that would benefit ordinary citizens and improve governance in the region. Among its major demands are the removal of special privileges enjoyed by the ruling elite, the abolition of Assembly seats reserved for Pakistan-based refugees, the provision of free healthcare services, and the introduction of a uniform education system for all citizens.

The committee has also demanded the establishment of an international airport in the region. It further called for an end to employment quotas reserved for Pakistan-based refugees in PoJK. JAAC believes these measures are necessary to ensure equal opportunities and fair representation for local residents.

Describing the campaign as a people-led movement, JAAC questioned the actions taken against demonstrators. The committee maintained that the protests have remained peaceful and argued that there was no justification for the use of force. It argued why authorities were treating peaceful protesters as a threat when they were simply demanding their rights.

Raising concerns over the response of the authorities, JAAC stated that the movement had never resorted to violence. It questioned which part of its Charter of Demands was being used to justify action against demonstrators. Referring to the reported use of force, the committee asked what aspect of the charter was being cited as a reason to "fire bullets at innocent, peaceful, unarmed people."

The committee also challenged government claims that several of its demands had already been implemented. According to JAAC, ministers frequently speak about progress on these issues but fail to provide evidence to support their statements. It insisted that public representatives should be transparent and present proof whenever they claim that the demands have been fulfilled.

Addressing government officials directly, JAAC stated, "Those ministers who talk about implementing the demands should also present evidence." The committee argued that authorities often avoid responding to public concerns, especially when the issues raised could affect the privileges and benefits enjoyed by those in power.

JAAC further alleged that its supporters have suffered heavily during the movement. The committee claimed that dozens of supporters had lost their lives, while hundreds had sustained injuries. It also alleged that many individuals remained missing. In addition, JAAC expressed concern over the medical treatment being provided to those who were injured during the protests. It claimed that several wounded individuals were not receiving proper healthcare and support.

Despite these allegations, the committee stressed that it would continue its campaign through peaceful means. JAAC said it remained committed to achieving its objectives without resorting to violence. The organisation reiterated that its struggle was focused on securing rights for the people and would continue regardless of the challenges it faced.

Reaffirming its commitment to non-violent methods, the committee declared, "We remain peaceful, we will obtain our rights by remaining peaceful, and on this, we will not compromise."

The latest statement from JAAC reflects growing tensions between the rights movement and the authorities in PoJK. While the committee continues to push for reforms and implementation of its demands, it has accused political parties and government institutions of ignoring public concerns and relying on force rather than dialogue. At the same time, JAAC has maintained that its movement remains peaceful and that it will continue pursuing its demands through non-violent means.