Over 200 veterans strongly object to the conduct of Rahul Gandhi in Parliament, demand an apology
- In Reports
- 07:16 PM, Mar 17, 2026
- Myind Staff
A group of 204 retired officers, including 116 from the armed forces, has raised strong objections to the conduct of Rahul Gandhi and several opposition MPs during an incident that took place on March 12 within the premises of the Parliament of India. In an open letter, the group expressed deep concern over what they described as inappropriate behaviour by the Leader of the Opposition and his colleagues.
The controversy centres on Gandhi and other opposition MPs sitting on the steps of Parliament while having tea and biscuits. The retired officers criticised this act, stating that it was carried out “in a manner that was wholly unbecoming of members of the nation’s highest legislative body”. They pointed out that this behaviour took place despite clear instructions from the Speaker that prohibit demonstrations or protests within the Parliament premises. According to the letter, the Opposition, led by Gandhi, chose to ignore these directives on that day.
The signatories of the letter included not only former armed forces personnel but also 84 retired bureaucrats, among them four former ambassadors, as well as four senior advocates. Together, they emphasised that the steps of Parliament should not be turned into a space for “spectacle or political theatre”. They argued that such actions diminish the seriousness of the institution and send the wrong message to the public.
“Such conduct within the precincts of Parliament represents a clear disregard for established norms of behaviour and decorum. It reflects an attitude of arrogance and entitlement, and a troubling lack of respect for an institution that embodies the democratic will of the people of India,” the letter stated. The group stressed that Parliament is not just another public place, but a symbol of democratic values and governance in the country.
The letter further underlined that the conduct of MPs inside Parliament premises must meet the highest standards of propriety and respect. It highlighted the unique and important role that the Parliament of India plays in the constitutional framework of the country. According to the signatories, Parliament is where the collective will of the people is expressed, laws are debated and passed, and the foundation of the Republic is strengthened.
“Parliament of India occupies a unique and elevated position within our constitutional architecture. It is the supreme forum of democratic deliberation where the collective will of the people is articulated, laws are shaped, and the foundations of the Republic are continually reaffirmed. The dignity of Parliament, therefore, is not a matter of mere convention but an essential element of the constitutional ethos that governs our democracy,” the letter read. The group made it clear that maintaining the dignity of Parliament is not optional but essential to preserving democratic values.
The signatories also noted that parliamentary conventions extend beyond the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha chambers. They include all parts of the premises, such as stairs, corridors, and lobbies. “Parliamentary practice and long-standing conventions recognise that the sanctity attached to the Chambers of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha extends equally to all areas within the parliamentary precincts, including its stairs, corridors, and lobbies,” the letter added. This, they said, makes it necessary for MPs to maintain decorum at all times within the entire complex.
The group further criticised what they described as deliberate defiance of authority. “Such a deliberate defiance of the Chair does not merely proceed, it reflects a conscious disregard for parliamentary authority and a willingness to place personal political theatrics above the dignity and constitutional institution,” the letter states. They argued that such actions undermine the authority of the Chair and weaken institutional discipline.
In addition to addressing this specific incident, the letter also accused Rahul Gandhi of repeatedly lowering the level of public discourse through similar acts. The signatories said that Parliament is often referred to as the temple of democracy, where important national issues are discussed. They expressed concern that such behaviour distracts from serious debate and reduces the quality of discussions.
“Such actions suggest a pattern of conduct driven less by respect for democratic institutions and more by a sense of personal privilege that treats Parliament as a stage for provocative rather than a forum for serious deliberation. In the process, valuable public time and resources are lost. Parliamentary proceedings must not be disrupted or trivialised in ways that undermine the functioning of this vital democratic institution,” they said. They also noted that the situation becomes more serious because Gandhi holds the position of Leader of the Opposition, which carries significant responsibility.
The retired officers emphasised that MPs are custodians of a key constitutional institution. They said their actions have both symbolic and practical importance. Maintaining decorum, according to them, helps strengthen public trust in democratic institutions. “The credibility of Parliament is reinforced when its Members uphold the traditions of propriety and restraint that have always defined parliamentary life,” they added.
Expressing disappointment over the incident, the group said they were deeply pained by repeated actions that they believe weaken the effectiveness of Parliament. “As citizens who have served this nation for decades in public life, we are deeply pained to witness repeated attempts by Rahul Gandhi and his associates that risk weakening the effectiveness of this temple of democracy,” they stated.
The letter concluded with a direct demand for an apology from Rahul Gandhi. The signatories also urged him to reflect on his conduct and attitude. They stressed that such reflection is necessary to ensure that the dignity, authority, and institutional sanctity of Parliament are preserved.
“As citizens committed to the preservation and strengthening of India’s democracy, institutions, it is incumbent upon all of us to call out conduct that diminishes the dignity of Parliament, an institution that embodies the sovereign will of the people of India. The events witnessed reflect a troubling sense of hubris and privilege that has no place in a constitutional democracy, let alone in the conduct of the Leader of the Opposition,” the letter added.

Comments