Jharkhand: BJP alleges ACF, FRO exam papers stolen from strong rooms, accuses Congress-led INDIA bloc of paper loot
- In Reports
- 07:42 PM, Sep 05, 2026
- Myind Staff
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Saturday alleged that question papers for the Assistant Conservator of Forests (ACF) and Forest Range Officer (FRO) examinations in Jharkhand were stolen from strong rooms and later tampered with. The party accused the Congress-led INDIA bloc of failing to protect students’ interests and ensure the security of recruitment examinations.
The allegations come weeks after a major student-led protest in Jharkhand over alleged irregularities in examinations conducted by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) and Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC). The protests had raised questions over the conduct and fairness of recruitment examinations in the state.
Addressing a press briefing in New Delhi, BJP national spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi targeted the Congress-led INDIA bloc over the issue. He alleged that the investigation into the Jharkhand Public Service Commission had brought out details about what happened during the recruitment examinations.
“Facts have emerged during the investigation process of the Jharkhand Public Service Commission that reveal the ground reality of the Congress-led INDI alliance when it comes to students’ interests".
Trivedi said the incident should not be described simply as a paper leak. He alleged that the question papers were taken directly from a secured location and altered before the examinations.
“Facts have emerged that, in the examination for the Assistant Conservator of Forests and Forest Range Officer, the strong room was broken into, the question papers were taken out, and changes were made to them. In other words, whatever happened in Jharkhand was not a paper leak… it was a paper loot", he said.
The BJP leader also questioned the security arrangements at the strong room where the examination papers were stored. He said the alleged breach showed that the authorities had failed to protect the question papers properly before the examinations.
“This has also proved how weak the security of the strong room there was. At the same time, it has also proved how weak the so-called claims of the Congress are when it comes to safeguarding students’ interests and ensuring that the examination process runs smoothly".
The latest political attack comes against the backdrop of a wider student movement over examination irregularities. In July, while Gen Z protesters were holding demonstrations at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar over the NEET-UG paper leak, students in Jharkhand also began an agitation over alleged problems in JPSC and JSSC examinations.
Student leader Devendra Nath Mahato led the protests in Jharkhand and went on an indefinite hunger strike. The agitation also received support from the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), which had played a role in the Jantar Mantar protests in Delhi.
The demonstrations gained momentum as students continued to raise concerns over the recruitment examination process. Their demands focused on alleged irregularities and the need for a fair and transparent system for conducting government recruitment examinations.
The Hemant Soren-led Jharkhand government responded by scrapping several recruitment examinations. It also ordered a probe by the state Criminal Investigation Department (CID) into the alleged irregularities. Following these steps, student organisations temporarily suspended their street protests.
The BJP has now used the alleged strong room breach to question the state government's handling of recruitment examinations. While the BJP has described the incident as “paper loot”, the state government's decision to cancel examinations and order a CID investigation has shifted attention to its outcomes.
The issue remains significant for thousands of candidates preparing for government recruitment examinations. The security of question papers, the transparency of the examination process and timely action against irregularities remain key concerns for students and examination authorities.

Comments