Canada allowing space to separatist elements shows its vote bank is more powerful than rule of law: S Jaishankar
- In Reports
- 10:02 PM, May 10, 2024
- Myind Staff
S. Jaishankar's remarks highlight India's concerns regarding Canada's approach to political groups advocating separatism, particularly those linked to the Khalistani movement. His comments suggest a perception that Canada may prioritise political considerations over adherence to the rule of law in its dealings with certain groups, which could strain bilateral relations.
Jaishankar's mention of freedom of speech underscores India's commitment to democratic principles while also emphasising that such freedoms do not extend to supporting violence or threatening foreign diplomats. His questioning of Canada's immigration policies regarding individuals with alleged ties to separatist movements reflects India's broader worries about the global reach of such movements and their potential to disrupt stability.
These statements by the Indian External Affairs Minister indicate a desire for Canada to address India's concerns regarding the activities of Khalistani separatist elements within its borders, potentially signaling a need for enhanced cooperation on counterterrorism and immigration matters between the two countries.
S. Jaishankar's remarks underscore the importance of upholding the rule of law and conducting proper background checks on individuals entering a country. His comments suggest concern about the potential implications of allowing individuals with dubious backgrounds or questionable documentation to reside in Canada. By emphasising the need for adherence to legal and immigration protocols, Jaishankar implies that failure to do so may indicate a prioritisation of political interests over the principles of law and order.
The significant presence of the Indian diaspora in Canada, particularly the Sikh community, highlights the political influence this demographic holds within Canadian politics. Jaishankar's statements hint at a perception that political considerations, including the influence of certain voting blocs, may be overshadowing efforts to address security concerns related to separatist movements.
The strained relations between India and Canada, particularly following Prime Minister Trudeau's allegations regarding Indian involvement in a specific case, reflect broader tensions regarding Canada's approach to handling issues related to Khalistani separatist elements. India's rejection of Trudeau's claims and its consistent stance on the issue underscores the seriousness with which it views the presence of such groups operating from Canadian soil.
Overall, Jaishankar's comments suggest a frustration with what India perceives as a lack of action by Canada to address its concerns regarding the political space afforded to pro-Khalistani elements within Canadian society. This frustration could potentially strain bilateral relations further unless addressed through diplomatic dialogue and cooperation.
S. Jaishankar expressed concern about the presence of individuals within Canadian politics who openly support separatism and extremism. He emphasised that India cannot ignore this reality in its efforts to maintain good relations with Canada.
Jaishankar highlighted Canada's response to India's concerns, noting that Canadian authorities often cite freedom of speech as justification for their approach. However, he emphasised that freedom of speech, while respected in both countries, should not extend to activities that threaten foreign diplomats or support separatism, which could harm bilateral relations. Furthermore, Jaishankar pointed out that allowing individuals with dubious backgrounds, including those associated with organised crime, undermines the principle of freedom of speech.
India has recently raised concerns about the security of its diplomats in Canada, urging Ottawa to take steps to ensure their safety and enable them to carry out their duties without fear. These concerns underscore the importance of addressing the broader issue of political space afforded to individuals and groups that may pose security risks to diplomatic personnel and harm bilateral relations between India and Canada.
Following Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau's accusations in September, there were reports of pro-Khalistani groups threatening Indian diplomats. In response, India requested Ottawa to reduce its diplomatic presence in Canada to achieve parity. Subsequently, Canada withdrew 41 diplomats and their families from India.
India has consistently emphasised that its primary concern with Canada is the political space afforded to separatists, terrorists, and anti-India elements within the country. Recently, Canadian authorities charged three Indian citizens with the murder of Nijjar. Reports indicate that they entered Canada using student visas. On 9th May 2024, India stated that Canada has not yet provided any specific evidence or information regarding the case.
Image Source: Business Today
Comments